Mercedes SLK World banner

Most affordable AMG ?

161 views 15 replies 8 participants last post by  Phillip Lee  
#1 ·
#4 ·
The SLK32 wins the performance value award in AMGs by a mile.
The price of entry is affordable, and the car is simpler than most other AMGs for easier maintenance.
No active suspension or other failure points of the larger cars.

The challenge for all older cars is technical support and parts.

R
 
#5 ·
I'd kill for a good SLK32 ;) I've PPI-d 4 of them in Germany, and they were by no means what I'd call "good". They became collector cars, at least twice as expensive as in US.

Re-imported US and Japan cars are slightly cheaper but I don't like the esthetics of cars from these markets. They are also mostly fix & flip with no meaningful history.

Same applies to R171 55AMG.
 
#6 ·
I'm interested in the R170 32AMG. Does anyone know of a list of the upgrades from the standard model included in the AMG?

And can a standard R170 320 be upgraded to AMG specs?
 
Save
#7 ·
Part 2.

ish.
The AMG engine is hand built, so even if you replace everything it can never be a true AMG.
Not a totally bogus copy, but not genuine either.
‘Might be able’ to swap in an AMG engine, but I think there are trans differences too.

Many do swap parts (bodywork etc) to gain an AMG appearance.
 
#8 ·
Thanks, Myk.

I'm mostly interested in those upgrades that improved handling. How different is the suspension setup? Is it a question of replacing the control arms, struts, springs, control rods, etc., or are the frame connection points different between the standard and AMG models? Are the upgraded parts available still?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Avel Du
Save
#9 ·
The SLK32 is a complete AMG update that touches all major components of the car, it is not practical or cost effective to try to convert a 320 to an SLK32, there are just too many changes to engine, cooling, brakes, trans, diff, ABS, ECUs, etc. (Just buy an SLK32, they aren't that expensive)

However - the suspension conversion could be done to update the 320 (or 230) to the SLK32 version relatively easily.
Control arms and linkages are the same.
Parts that are different:
SLK32 has factory Eibach springs front and rear, these can be installed on the 320
SLK32 has larger anti roll bars f/r, which can be installed on the 320
SLK32 has 20% higher damping rates on front shocks, rear shocks the same on 320

The factory shocks for front of the '32 may be discontinued, and would be quite expensive anyway.
A better solution is to use Bilstein B6 on the front and B4 on the rear, this would be very OEM and similar damping as the factory '32 setup.
Another alternative would be to use Koni sport yellow adjustable shocks f/r if you really want to get into suspension tuning, a bit more money though,

Just the shocks would be a big difference, try the B6/B4 trick and see if that satisfies before doing springs and roll bars (which probably have to be sourced used).

ALSO - The Bilstein part catalog has an apparent error, in that they don't recognize the difference in SLK32/320/230 and show the same part numbers for all 3 models - so if you order all 4 shocks B6, they will be right in the front for a '32 but too firm in the rear, and conversely B4 will be too soft in front and same in rear. SO, the Bilstein solution to mimic the factory '32 is B6 front and B4 rear.

Happy top down spirited motoring,
R
 
#14 ·
Indeed, just puzzled why their web site doesn't show a product they make/made, maybe because it was a contract part to MB and they can't sell it direct ? I have seen used ones on ebay..

R
 
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.